Friday 23 March 2012


Wikipedia: the go to source for winning a bet.

 Wikipedia may not always have the most reliable sources only because any person can write and type up their own information to any “stub”.  Though, when writing a Wikipedia article there are specific guidelines to follow. It must of reliable sources such as peer-reviewed articles and the sources must be traceable.  
For my assignment, I chose to add to the “Folk Linguistics stub”. I have taken linguistics classes before and it is an area I have an interest in, though it is not my main interest I figured I would find some research done on it. I found information about folk linguistics using the ualberta libraries website.  The information I found was all from research articles that explained the origin and how about folk linguistics came to be what it is today,which is very similar to language ideology.  Folk linguistics is a form of speech with an underlying belief that has existed since the beginning of time.

In making this Wikipedia article, I tried to use some the Wikipedia formatting. There are some symbols that are straightforward but some of them were confusing and I didn’t quite know how to double up some of the symbols.  Though in the process of writing this article I learnt that I will start to think more critically about Wkis and question their content more often. 


Here is my print screen photos of my editing to the wiki stub:     

Folk Linguitics Wikipedia page -  editing. From Laura Scot's personal collection, March 23, 2012. 


 

As this person's blog mentions, I as well didn't realize how many stubs were out there and incomplete. Finding information via the internet may be easy as typing it into google or wikipedia but it may not be the most reliable and be credentially accurate. Important information may be missing to fully understand a concept. 


I did not actually publish my article, I just did the preview of my article.